I thought this peer review style was the best. It gave our group the freedom to edit the way we felt most effective, but also gave us guidelines to follow to make sure we hit the major aspects we wanted to as a group. Our group being able to decide how we wanted to peer review allowed us to get what we wanted out of a peer review. We chose to focus on major arguments because for an initial review, being able to get opinions on our main arguments was important for our revision process. We chose to avoid redundancy. By that I mean that if someone had already made a point about something on your paper, another person did not have to make the same point. That was something about the in-class requirements for peer reviews that we did not like. This is a peer review style I would apply to my other classes and I feel my classmates would like as well. The pre-made guidelines were good for the initial peer reviews, but once we figured out how we liked to do it, our method worked best for us and I feel, out of the peer reviews we have done, I got the best results from this one.